|
Guest
Guest
|
 |
« on: March 24, 2004, 08:31:50 PM » |
|
Sorry for double post, but I think its better to put here.
when I run plist.php, it says:
<br /> Notice: Undefined variable: server_status_empty in C:\guid_parser\plist.php on line 60<br />
But it does write something unreadable in guids.txt.
Is it a problem or not>?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2004, 08:32:35 PM » |
|
Oops sorry, you already gave the answer 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2004, 08:33:12 PM » |
|
Oops sorry, you already gave the answer  no problem  Notices in PHP are telling the programmer to declare the variables or atleast check if they exists before using them.
I've fixed this "problem" in the upcomming version. Files are yet to be released.
These notices does not disturb the scripts functions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2004, 09:15:48 PM » |
|
btw, where do I put the servername?
I have $show_servername=1;
Does it get the servername automaticly? Or should I put it somwhere?
Greetz, Aarsbuds0r
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2004, 10:05:23 PM » |
|
btw, where do I put the servername?
I have $show_servername=1;
Does it get the servername automaticly? Or should I put it somwhere?
Greetz, Aarsbuds0r The servername is automatically included. =)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2004, 02:23:28 AM » |
|
Btw, isnt it verry easy to send fake info??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2004, 08:57:50 AM » |
|
Btw, isnt it verry easy to send fake info?? No. The data is encrypted.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2004, 01:28:43 PM » |
|
Ah very nice =)
I realy like this script + site. My server (UT@UT) is now also sending its information.
Btw, is there gonna be a way to search for players by IP?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2004, 02:05:03 PM » |
|
Ah very nice =)
I realy like this script + site. My server (UT@UT) is now also sending its information. Nice, thank you. =) Btw, is there gonna be a way to search for players by IP? I will look into that. Thank you for the suggestion. If it turns out to be fast and useful, I'll add it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2004, 02:29:50 PM » |
|
Btw, is there gonna be a way to search for players by IP? Added.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2004, 04:22:45 PM » |
|
w00t, you are super-fast =) Very nice!
You decided not to show the last number of the IP, wich is understandable.
Is there not some way to be able to use that whois-thing again? Like you could before the search by IP was possible? (Maybe a little button next to the IP or smt.)
Thanks again =]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2004, 07:46:31 PM » |
|
w00t, you are super-fast =) Very nice! Thank you. =) You decided not to show the last number of the IP, wich is understandable.
Is there not some way to be able to use that whois-thing again? Like you could before the search by IP was possible? (Maybe a little button next to the IP or smt.) Yes, the search engine searches the database for the three first octets of the IP. I readded the whois look up function. But this time it will look up the first IP on the actual net. For ex. If the user is registered with the IP; 192.168.0.50 The look up will be performed on the IP; 192.168.0.1 I know the whois result can sometimes show the wrong net block owner because of this, but that's the way it has to be from now on. Thanks again =] You're welcome. =)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: March 25, 2004, 09:18:49 PM » |
|
I am aware of this. If you have the strength to go through all the IP's, you'll probably have the strength to get the IP some other way too. =) I can.. ofcourse, disable this but what for!?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2004, 11:45:40 PM » |
|
Exactly. Theres no real reason to do that. Its good as it is. The question is:
If you can get the IP anywayz, then why not show the entire IP instead of hiding last part?
My answer would be: Cause lots of people have dynamic IP.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|